The ground we cover
This desk writes about the Floating Dragon pokie and the Australian-facing casinos that carry it. That means the published return-to-player figure and what it implies over a long run of spins, how volatility shapes the feel of a session, how the demo version differs from play with a balance, and the mechanics of the hold-and-respin feature. We also keep a plain record of which operators list the game and on what terms.
We do not cover sports betting, table games or live-dealer rooms beyond what is needed to place a pokie in context. If a page here is not about Floating Dragon, its maths or the casinos offering it, it does not belong on the site.
How we check a number before printing it
Every figure we print is traced to a source we can point to. For return-to-player and volatility, that means the game’s own published information rather than a figure copied from another affiliate page. Where an operator states a different RTP for the same title, we say so and note the discrepancy rather than averaging it away.
We distinguish between what is published and what we have observed. A stated RTP is a long-run average, not a promise about any single session, and we write about it that way. Where a number cannot be confirmed, we leave it out. A gap in a page is better than a figure we cannot stand behind.
How an operator gets reviewed here
We look at an operator’s cashier first, because that is where most disputes begin. The cashier must accept VISA, MasterCard and crypto — USDT, BTC, LTC, ETH, DOGE and TRX. We note plainly that PayID, POLi, Neosurf and BPAY are not accepted, so nobody arrives expecting a method that is not there.
Beyond the cashier we read the withdrawal terms, the bonus conditions attached to pokie play, and the complaints record where one exists. An operator that lists Floating Dragon but buries the wagering terms does not get a clean write-up. We would rather carry fewer listings than recommend a casino we would not use ourselves.
How we make money
The site earns through affiliate arrangements. When a reader follows a link to an operator and signs up, we may receive a commission. That is the whole of the commercial model, and it is worth stating plainly because it creates an obvious incentive to send readers to whichever operator pays most.
We do not let that happen. Commission rates do not decide placement, and an operator cannot pay to be described as safe, fast or fair. Where a casino has poor withdrawal terms, we say so even if it is a listed partner. If the two ever come into conflict, the review wins and the listing goes.
How to tell us we are wrong
If a figure here is out of date, or an operator has changed its cashier or its terms, write to the reviews desk and say which page and which line. We would rather correct a page than defend it. Changes to payment methods, RTP and bonus conditions are the ones readers flag most often, and those are the ones we check first.
We do not publish corrections quietly. Where a number was wrong, the page is amended and the amendment noted. If you think a review is unfair to an operator, or too generous, that is worth hearing too. Send the detail, not just the objection, and we will look at it.